Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by chonkerz on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @02:19AM
(#37318346)
The owner shed his Section 230 protections when he made posts directly involved in harassment of his victims that he has a personal beef with. Even the EFF's article says the site is full of crime and called on the cops to prosecute. This also means they won't defend your beloved website in court.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by richbell on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @10:26AM
(#37322647)
> The owner shed his Section 230 protections when he made posts directly involved in harassment of his victims that he has a personal beef with.
That's an interesting legal theory.
> Even the EFF's article says the site is full of crime and called on the cops to prosecute. This also means they won't defend your beloved website in court.
An organization making a claim is not evidence of the claim being true.
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by chonkerz on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @04:58PM
(#37329035)
>An organization making a claim is not evidence of the claim being true.
Only the claims you like are claims you will accept as true
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by richbell on Saturday September 02, 2023 @01:31PM
(#37363603)
> Only the claims you like are claims you will accept as true
My personal feelings are irrelevant. I judge claims based on the veracity of their evidence, as should anyone else.