News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why Did Python Win? by masklinn on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @04:27PM (#37313513)
> Python ended up 'specializing' in data contexts, thanks to Numpy / Pandas

Yeah it was a success 20 years in the making, had a fair amount of input from science men and that being GvR’s background he responded positively e.g. the extended slices (striding) and ability to index with an unparenthesised tuple (multidimensional indexing) were very much added for the convenience of numpy’s ancestors.

I would not say it had no competition, Perl used to be quite popular in at least some sci-comp fields (I want to say bioinformatics but I’m probably wrong).

Re:Ask HN: Why Did Python Win? by cutler on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @04:42PM (#37313740)
Why probably wrong? Bioperl was very big in the bioinformatics world.
Re:Ask HN: Why Did Python Win? by masklinn on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @04:44PM (#37313771)
> Why probably wrong?

Because I don’t have a great memory and I was never into Perl so I was extremely unsure of the suggestion and didn’t want it to come across as an assertion.

Re:Ask HN: Why Did Python Win? by cutler on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @07:56PM (#37315811)
James Tisdall and O'Reilly produced "Beginning Perl for Bioinformatics" which sold like hotcakes at Perl conferences.