Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by selimnairb on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @08:05AM
(#37306475)
Large energy companies should be nationalized and run rationally, i.e. in a way that acknowledges the extreme scarcity of waste absorption capacity we are faced with.
Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by kozak on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @08:24AM
(#37306673)
Nationalization is not a guaranteed solution because of the dangers of populism.
Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by devoutsalsa on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @08:48AM
(#37306969)
Venezuela sheds a tear.
Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by 10u152 on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @08:18AM
(#37306609)
Clearly communism is the answer! It’s worked so well before!
Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by remh on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @08:26AM
(#37306707)
i recommend you open a dictionary and look for the definition of "nuance"
Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by tenpies on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @08:47AM
(#37306965)
I think proponents of this should move to some of the beautiful utopias where the energy companies are already nationalized and through the magic of socialism, emissions will no doubt cease any day now: Venezuela, Colombia, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Russia, Kuwait, Nigeria, or China.
My point here is that nationalization has nothing to do with climate change.
Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by breakyerself on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @11:07AM
(#37309041)
Norway did it
Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by jaybrendansmith on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @12:27PM
(#37310278)
Nationalized industry sucks. Every time we try it, ultimately we get worse off. But if you're saying that we need to have a carbon trading market or some other such strong regulation that includes externalities, yes we definitely should. In the US, conservatives used to believe in market-based approaches to solving big problems. Now they just deny the problems exist. This is the mindset of a child, not an adult. Grown ups own their mistakes and solve the problems, they don't point fingers and deny they exist.
Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by fulafel on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @10:13AM
(#37308255)
I think the more consistent counterfactual scenario without mass hydrocarbon extraction would be to consider that population would not have grown to the current level (instead of imagining the current population and a sudden disappearance of hydrocarbons).
Re:Exxon says world set to fail 2°C global warming cap by 2050
by acdha on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @10:24AM
(#37308413)
> But, at the same time we need their product to live.
This isn’t a binary choice. Imagine how much better off we’d be now if they’d accepted their own scientists’ reports in the 1970s and tried to get in on greening the economy instead of funding decades of obstruction? Jimmy Carter could have gotten his nuclear power plants, the remaining ICE vehicles would use a fraction of the fuel as the average vehicle purchased in the United States today, and we’d be saving our carbon emissions for things which are harder to replace like industrial chemistry rather than literally heating the outdoors so someone doesn’t need to wear long sleeves to dinner.
Energy companies are both huge part of the problem - and at the same time the only reason modern civilization exists.
Hydrocarbons are primary input still to most of the processes we have to exist above ... well, actually exist, because the alternative with this amount of people to hydrocarbon driven economy is mass starvation.
The energy companies should be taken to court for the damage they have done to planet via their anti-climate-action PR.
But, at the same time we need their product to live.