News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Raise Less, Build More by nemothekid on Monday August 28, 2023 @05:35PM (#37300693)
Wouldn't getting 50% on a billion be a harder problem than getting 300% on 100MM.
Re:Raise Less, Build More by lmm on Monday August 28, 2023 @08:16PM (#37301971)
> Wouldn't getting 50% on a billion be a harder problem than getting 300% on 100MM.

Seems unlikely. Does whatever you were doing with the 100MM really scale that badly?

Re:Raise Less, Build More by timfsu on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @03:12AM (#37304384)
When it comes to investing in startups, I think the answer is yes, because there are presumably a limited number of winners
Re:Raise Less, Build More by darkerside on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @08:17AM (#37306590)
You found 5 unicorns. Can it really be that hard to find 45 more???
Re:Raise Less, Build More by lmm on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @11:04PM (#37317160)
You've only gotta find 3 more to hit that 50%, and you get 9x as many tries as it took you to find the original 5. I like those odds, shrug.
Re:Raise Less, Build More by darkerside on Wednesday August 30, 2023 @12:58PM (#37325141)
Ahh I did the math wrong. I agree now the initial premise is a little silly. Although, don't discount that it will take you 9x the amount of time to spend those resources. So this is going from a 1 year search to a 9 year search. Or, you're building a team and trusting other people, which scales better long term, but not in the short term.