News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SEC brought its first non-fungible token enforcement action by yieldcrv on Monday August 28, 2023 @12:42PM (#37296881)
crypto consumers should be far more discerning than they are

even the term “rug-pull” is not discerning enough, it refers to a dozen distinct behaviors, of which a few would still be illegal while the other many behaviors are just a misalignment of expectations

removing liquidity? thats not illegal under either consumer or securities framework and most commonly called a “rug pull”. communities can provide their own liquidity as a feature of the crypto space, and in no space do purchasers have an expectation for liquidity

ceasing to continue making press releases or taking down a website and community channels? also not illegal under the consumer or securities framework.

taking other people’s provided liquidity out of a staking contract without saying thats whats going to happen would be illegal under both frameworks. that kind of rug pull is theft.

collecting funds and promising to do X and then not even attempting it, thats prosecutable under both the consumer and securities frameworks, in more ways under a securities framework

Re:SEC brought its first non-fungible token enforcement action by lukev on Monday August 28, 2023 @01:59PM (#37298015)
The only way to be discerning with respect to most* crypto is not to participate.

Even "succeeding" at crypto just means you sold early enough to a greater fool.

* jury still out on the couple major cryptocurrencies, though I hope they follow the same path.

Re:SEC brought its first non-fungible token enforcement action by yieldcrv on Monday August 28, 2023 @02:58PM (#37298854)
The SEC is not the arm of the government to help you feel validated, and I think thats the crux of your dissonance