News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Study: Carbon offsets aren’t doing their job, overstate i... by PakG1 on Sunday August 27, 2023 @07:59PM (#37287927)
GP was speaking about the problems with carbon offsets today. You're talking about the need to decarbonize without acknowledging or addressing the points that GP made. Most are not stupid enough to say that we should set down "the game" of decarbonization and walk away. Many intelligent people are saying that carbon credits don't seem to be working to date as part of "the game". Rather than point out the obvious of how important carbon decarbonization is, it would be better to discuss what GP gets wrong about carbon credits or offer an alternative solution.

"Man, my weight and health are difficult to manage, there are all these challenges I find difficult to handle, many of which aren't even directly related to nutrition or physical activity."

"Having a physically healthy body is important, you should take your nutrition and exercise seriously."

"Thanks a lot for the advice?"

Re:Study: Carbon offsets aren’t doing their job, overstate i... by tito on Sunday August 27, 2023 @08:10PM (#37288025)
In your analogy, yes, I'm the person that sees nutrition as exercise as the only levers, and so then my alternative solution is "well we need to get it right then". Open to other ideas for levers too.
Re:Study: Carbon offsets aren’t doing their job, overstate i... by PakG1 on Sunday August 27, 2023 @08:12PM (#37288041)
You have completely missed my point and I am not sure how to get you to see it. My point is that you did not respond to what someone has said, you ignored it and went on your own tangent. And you did it again.
Re:Study: Carbon offsets aren’t doing their job, overstate i... by tito on Sunday August 27, 2023 @08:16PM (#37288077)
Got it, I missed your point and still haven't got it. I appreciate that you took the time to respond.