Re:Why WhatsApp Was Able to Support 50B Messages a Day with ...
by crop_rotation on Sunday August 27, 2023 @06:09AM
(#37281161)
They are still so much better than almost anyone else in the space at preventing feature creep. It is still a remarkably small and focused app.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why WhatsApp Was Able to Support 50B Messages a Day with ...
by throwitaway156 on Sunday August 27, 2023 @06:23AM
(#37281242)
I think this is because of FB/Meta. I would assume that they dont have massive financial restrictions from investors due to their data harvesting capability. Other apps like Telegram, however, might work harder to introduce money-making features.
Re:Why WhatsApp Was Able to Support 50B Messages a Day with ...
by rpgbr on Sunday August 27, 2023 @06:19AM
(#37281221)
Is it? WhatsApp calls home a lot in background, so much it was draining my phone’s battery. Also, business features are coming for a while, bloating the app. Heck, on iOS its installer has 163 MB!
Crypto shit aside, I think Signal is way more focused. Element/Matrix, too.
Re:Why WhatsApp Was Able to Support 50B Messages a Day with ...
by crop_rotation on Sunday August 27, 2023 @06:29AM
(#37281284)
I know very well of 20 people atleast who use Whatsapp a lot and nobody has had an issue with battery due to Whatsapp. You can try Netguard and disable Whatsapp networking to validate your battery hypothesis, but I doubt it is true. Business features are not in the app for normal users (Whatsapp Business is a different app), and I don't even know of a single business feature. Business chats to me are like normal chats. 163 MB is below normal these days on iOS AFAIK. I think both Signal and Element have similar sizes.