Re:Can LLMs Solve the 'No-Reading Problem' of Contracts?
by jqpabc123 on Saturday August 26, 2023 @04:32PM
(#37276635)
"However, smart readers are not flawless."
In other words, they are unreliable --- which makes them kinda useless for anything of significance. They offer up some "word salad" that may or may not be representative.
Would you trust a calculator with your money if you knew that it might give you the wrong answer?
Re:Can LLMs Solve the 'No-Reading Problem' of Contracts?
by ybell on Saturday August 26, 2023 @04:11PM
(#37276423)
"Our analysis reveals that smart readers (1) reduce by 66.9% the length of contracts; (2) reduce reading time by 14:41 minutes (3) improve text readability by converting college-level texts to texts readable by fifth-grade students; and (4) do so without considerably compromising the essential information in the original contracts. However, smart readers are not flawless."
In other words, they are unreliable --- which makes them kinda useless for anything of significance. They offer up some "word salad" that may or may not be representative.
Would you trust a calculator with your money if you knew that it might give you the wrong answer?