News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Beating GPT-4 on HumanEval with a fine-tuned Cod... by gmm1990 on Friday August 25, 2023 @08:43PM (#37268807)
What parameters/prompts did you use, I was able to get ok results but not comparable to chat gpt or even bard
Re:Show HN: Beating GPT-4 on HumanEval with a fine-tuned Cod... by rushingcreek on Friday August 25, 2023 @08:46PM (#37268828)
We used no prompt (only autocomplete) for the HumanEval reproduction: https://huggingface.co/Phind/Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v1.

But you should be able to get it to do stuff just by telling it what you want. Note that it's completion tuned (not chat-tuned), so it should perform better on single-turn conversations.

Re:Show HN: Beating GPT-4 on HumanEval with a fine-tuned Cod... by syntaxing on Friday August 25, 2023 @09:01PM (#37268922)
I used textgen, instruct mode with LLaMa 2 template, “simple” parameters. What quantization method are you using?
Re:Show HN: Beating GPT-4 on HumanEval with a fine-tuned Cod... by gmm1990 on Friday August 25, 2023 @10:09PM (#37269296)
I used the llama.cpp quantize q_0 option. Seemed to vary widely just adjusting the temperature parameters. Was giving it an example db query saving to file in json and asking create a similar function did multiple queries.
Re:Show HN: Beating GPT-4 on HumanEval with a fine-tuned Cod... by syntaxing on Friday August 25, 2023 @10:41PM (#37269472)
I’m assuming typo and you mean 4? What model size? As mentioned above, I had serious issues making GGUF work well. I’m gonna post an article talking about a better way to set it up.