Value transfer would be worse because it would create bad incentives. Now I'd have a reason to flood garbage fake (/proxy) onion sites to skim the payments. The user would have to go obtain that value too, creating logistical challenges.
There might be legal issues for the users too-- e.g. upgrading copyright infringement into criminally prosecutable commercial copyright infringement.
Re:Proof-of-Work Defense for Onion Services
by runeks on Sunday August 27, 2023 @01:01PM
(#37284492)
Burning funds, instead of transferring them, would solve two of your three issues.
Obtaining the funds creates extra friction, yes, but it’s possible the benefit outweighs the cost — e.g. because an attacker can no longer utilize the idle CPUs of botnet devices.
Ultimately, any form of anti-DoS protection also punishes legitimate users. The question is (1) how much it punishes attackers relative to this, and (2) whether this punishment for legitimate users deters them, too.
This version is good, don't get me wrong, but adding value transfer would be better imo.