So you disapprove of the decision, but would have enforced it in the most asinine way at the expense of actual productivity.
I just hope to never work with you and, especially, never use anything you helped building.
What made you draw that conclusion?
I made the point that the metric used (raw number of tests) is bad a bad way to enforce a good goal (higher code quality). I also made the point that metrics aren’t inherently bad, but they have to be chosen judiciously.
You seemed to take those two points and extrapolate an entirely different story and motives that, frankly, reads as a bit unhinged. So i also hope we don’t cross paths, because in safety critical code development where I come from where bad practices and toxic teammates can kill people.
It’s telling that you show such dichotomous and defensive thinking.