News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:T-Mobile to Cut About 7% of Workforce, Mostly Corporate R... by gotaran on Thursday August 24, 2023 @12:15PM (#37250688)
I know many engineers at Meta and Google. They all say only chronic underperformers were laid off, and some chronic underperformers weren’t. It’s a different story for recruiters and middle managers, which were super bloated anyway.

So this is a good thing.

Re:T-Mobile to Cut About 7% of Workforce, Mostly Corporate R... by saagarjha on Thursday August 24, 2023 @12:39PM (#37251042)
No you don’t. If you knew any people at those companies they’d tell you the layoffs were haphazard and confused.
Re:T-Mobile to Cut About 7% of Workforce, Mostly Corporate R... by gotaran on Thursday August 24, 2023 @01:19PM (#37251746)
5 of my close friends work at Meta, and 2 at Google. All engineers.

I visit the NYC Union Square and Hudson Yards offices regularly for dinner, and even the Seattle Westlake and MPK ones whenever I’m visiting. The mood there is much much better post layoffs. Possibly even better than it was pre COVID.

Re:T-Mobile to Cut About 7% of Workforce, Mostly Corporate R... by saagarjha on Friday August 25, 2023 @05:43AM (#37259813)
It’s pretty amazing how lively they are, right? Almost as if everyone was asked to return to the office?
Re:T-Mobile to Cut About 7% of Workforce, Mostly Corporate R... by alphanullmeric on Thursday August 24, 2023 @03:16PM (#37253320)
That makes no sense. If I had to choose between two people to lay off, why would I get rid of the person that performs better?
Re:T-Mobile to Cut About 7% of Workforce, Mostly Corporate R... by saagarjha on Thursday August 24, 2023 @10:04PM (#37257009)
Ask Meta and Google.
Re:T-Mobile to Cut About 7% of Workforce, Mostly Corporate R... by TulliusCicero on Thursday August 24, 2023 @12:36PM (#37251008)
Riddle me this, Batman, but if that's true, why wasn't I laid off?
Re:T-Mobile to Cut About 7% of Workforce, Mostly Corporate R... by neilv on Thursday August 24, 2023 @12:43PM (#37251151)
I don't know whether "only chronic underperformers were laid off" is true or not, but...

It sounds like a meme that a big company might want to have internally, if they were trying to both reduce regretted/uncontrolled attrition, while also lighting a fire under people who the company thinks are complacent.

But the company would not say that publicly (nor want employees to say that too loudly), because that would be a big liability, defaming tens of thousands of people while they are job-hunting. Also, a jerk move.

Regardless, I'd normally expect any big company layoffs to likely include people that the company or some layer of management has wanted to get rid of (for various reasons, not all the fault of the employee). But layoffs will also hit people based on what project they're on, what department, what role, and simply because their manager was given a target number to reduce.

I also know of multiple high-performers who knew/assumed layoffs were coming, and already wanted to leave, so quietly put in a word with a trusted manager/exec, that they would like a severance package when the time comes. (And then the manager could keep another person or two they would've had to reduce otherwise.)

Re:T-Mobile to Cut About 7% of Workforce, Mostly Corporate R... by avgDev on Thursday August 24, 2023 @03:36PM (#37253559)
Celebrating layoffs is some end stage capitalism.