News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The first conformant M1 GPU driver by londons_explore on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @03:38AM (#37232905)
ActiveX required that the ActiveX code you wanted to run be already installed on your computer. The security mechanism was that users obviously wouldn't install insecure stuff...

Turns out nearly every extension had gaping security holes.

Re:The first conformant M1 GPU driver by nvm0n2 on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @06:06AM (#37233818)
Not quite. ActiveX would download and run unsandboxed native code direct from the web, even if it wasn't installed. The security mechanism was a popup dialog that contained the publisher name as verified by a code signing certificate.
Re:The first conformant M1 GPU driver by hot_gril on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @12:01PM (#37238089)
This is how I remember it. I was dealing with early 2000s smart home software that used ActiveX. I'd visit a website in IE, press ok, and run their "web app" that had raw access to my serial and ethernet ports. It was bizarre even for back then.