Re:70 years ago, an Anglo-US coup condemned Iran to decades ...
by JumpCrisscross on Saturday August 19, 2023 @03:18PM
(#37192134)
> yet the "war on terror" happened. US companies gained a lot from that even if the average taxpayer didn't
The War on Terror, and invasion of Iraq, were massive American policy failures. Had Xi not become a dictator and Putin not invaded Crimea and then the rest of Ukraine, American hegemony would be on a downturn as a result of those fumbles.
Re:70 years ago, an Anglo-US coup condemned Iran to decades ...
by FirmwareBurner on Saturday August 19, 2023 @04:48PM
(#37193030)
>The War on Terror, and invasion of Iraq, were massive American policy failures.
Not if you ask Halliburton
Re:70 years ago, an Anglo-US coup condemned Iran to decades ...
by JumpCrisscross on Saturday August 19, 2023 @07:35PM
(#37194440)
> Not if you ask Halliburton
The stockholders who have seen a third against since 2006?
You’re dragging a red herring. In the past, conquest was popular because it made the conqueror as a whole rich. Today, you’re limited to scratching out whatabouts with one-off and dated examples like Halliburton. The circle of net beneficiaries rivals that of botched aid operations.
Re:70 years ago, an Anglo-US coup condemned Iran to decades ...
by inglor_cz on Saturday August 19, 2023 @04:12PM
(#37192671)
In every war, someone gains something, but War on Terror was detrimental to the US as a whole, and the American population understands that - which is why the hawks are really unpopular right now. The defeat of H.C. in 2016 can at least partly be explained by the fact that she was considered a foreign policy hawk.
Compare this to wars of Ancient Rome which were actually popular, because they brought home visible wealth.
And yet the "war on terror" happened. US companies gained a lot from that even if the average taxpayer didn't.