Re:A few high end cloud server IO performance comparisons
by blakeperdue on Saturday March 17, 2012 @11:22PM
(#3719002)
Interesting from an IO point of view. It would be nice to have a clearer tie-in with CPU and other benchmarks for these providers. Does anyone have any experience with Storm on Demand to share? Their prices for SSD-based servers look enticing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A few high end cloud server IO performance comparisons
by jread on Sunday March 18, 2012 @12:02AM
(#3719063)
We co-locate with their parent company Liquid Web and have conducted extensive testing of their cloud services. They are a very solid service, knowledgable technical staff, very quick support response, great hardware, excellent reliability, and reasonable prices. We've been monitoring Storm for 2 years with 100% availability in 2 of their 3 regions: http://cloudharmony.com/status
Re:A few high end cloud server IO performance comparisons
by jread on Saturday March 17, 2012 @11:48PM
(#3719039)
Here is a CPU performance comparison for the same set of servers. This metric is an approximation of EC2's ECU for other providers (the algorithm uses 16 CPU benchmarks and EC2 instance performance as a baseline): http://cloudharmony.com/benchmarks?benchmarkId=ccu&selec...