News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:You probably don’t need to fine-tune LLMs by rafaelero on Friday August 18, 2023 @11:26AM (#37176915)
This is the approach I am using right now. My intuition for trying to finetune was that for complex questions it would be better if the model could naturally deal with those intrincacies instead of reading documents with concepts that are connected but not very explicitly so. There is also the problem with context window limit; sometimes I have to truncate the relevant documents, limiting the capacity of the model to offer a good answer.

But I am very impressed with GPT-4's abilities in finding the correct answer just by reading those documents, so I think the only problem still enduring is the context window size.

Re:You probably don’t need to fine-tune LLMs by CharlesW on Friday August 18, 2023 @11:48AM (#37177320)
> My intuition for trying to finetune was that for complex questions it would be better if the model could naturally deal with those intrincacies instead of reading documents with concepts that are connected but not very explicitly so.

That was my impression as well, which is why your comment was so interesting to me. Have you found tools/projects for the DAG approach that you'd recommend?