Re:Internet Archive Responds to Recording Industry Lawsuit T...
by AnthonyMouse on Thursday August 17, 2023 @01:27PM
(#37165208)
> archiving material that is already (by definition) archived by somebody, just not publicly accessible.
How useful to the public is it to have it archived but not publicly accessible?
> They're clearly violating the law, they've lost already on a similar case
They're not clearly violating the law, they're doing something where the law isn't established (which is the point), and the other case is subject to appeal.
How useful to the public is it to have it archived but not publicly accessible?
> They're clearly violating the law, they've lost already on a similar case
They're not clearly violating the law, they're doing something where the law isn't established (which is the point), and the other case is subject to appeal.