New York Times considers legal action against OpenAI as copyright tensions swirl

Re:New York Times considers legal action against OpenAI as c... by pixl97 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @07:59AM (#37160279)

But a business can (at least in the US)?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York Times considers legal action against OpenAI as c... by lewhoo on Thursday August 17, 2023 @08:11AM (#37160398)

But by business we mean an organization of people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York Times considers legal action against OpenAI as c... by Filligree on Thursday August 17, 2023 @10:18AM (#37161983)

For the moment. How many years until we see the first person-less business?

I’m sure there’ll be a human on the books, on paper.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York Times considers legal action against OpenAI as c... by telotortium on Thursday August 17, 2023 @03:21PM (#37166652)

If a human is willing to be put on the line for any errors the LLM makes, I don't see why a person-less business wouldn't be allowed. The legal system won't tolerate a business where they can't pursue a human in the case of wrongdoing or liability. Something like a DAO won't be allowed in the near future, though.

[ Parent | on HN ]