News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DeepEval – Unit Testing for LLMs by d4rkp4ttern on Thursday August 17, 2023 @07:56AM (#37160252)
This is a fair question on the surface, but one thing that occurs to me — given the sheer number of similar-looking things people put out, people may not have the time to exhaustively compare their offering with others. You often only discover differentiation by diving deep into each framework/lib etc, and if you dive into every Twitter-amplified new framework/package then you would never have time build your own thing.

So I guess what is a builder to do? Probably focus on practical use cases, show adoption and let these speak for themselves?

Re:DeepEval – Unit Testing for LLMs by swyx on Thursday August 17, 2023 @11:46AM (#37163462)
for what its worth, i agree, i've had this exact chat with @areibman (who is replying downthread). this is why i asked for market insight rather than a competitor by competitor diff.
Re:DeepEval – Unit Testing for LLMs by d4rkp4ttern on Thursday August 17, 2023 @12:19PM (#37164049)
Got it, that makes sense