Re:Tesla’s $10k-Cheaper Model S, X Are Software Locked for L...
by Shawnj2 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @03:06AM
(#37158217)
Sure but they shouldn’t make 1 car and software lock half the features, sure economically it works out but practically it’s wasteful to the consumer. FSD is one thing if you have a software product not in the base car you are selling for a reasonable price but selling the only software that can unlock existing hardware in your car is atrocious. Out of principle I’m not buying a car like that unless I can jailbreak it
Re:Tesla’s $10k-Cheaper Model S, X Are Software Locked for L...
by sheepshear on Thursday August 17, 2023 @04:23PM
(#37167434)
Every electric car on the road has some amount of software-locked range. Tesla is just passing some choice along to you. The price must be higher for the harder-wearing configuration because the warranty is the same.
It's good for cost-sensitive short-range drivers because they're no longer subsidizing warranties for long-range drivers. You'll have to do the math for yourself to see if it's good for you.
Re:Tesla’s $10k-Cheaper Model S, X Are Software Locked for L...
by Shawnj2 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @04:33PM
(#37167597)
That may be true for software locked range but that’s not true for software locked heated seats or other similar features
Re:Tesla’s $10k-Cheaper Model S, X Are Software Locked for L...
by sheepshear on Thursday August 17, 2023 @04:43PM
(#37167752)
I agree, I wasn't disputing that.
I appreciate that it rankles the hacker in most (myself included) when Intel blows a fuse or Tesla flashes firmware to price discriminate.
But the math on whether more or less EVs get sold because the high-end subsidizes the mid-range, how that affects consumers and the environment, where this all sits legally?
Almost certainly complicated AF. It seems a bit hasty to consider just one data point out of that insane Pareto topology and call it good.