News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WASF3 disrupts mitochondria and may mediate exercise into... by flyinglizard on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @08:15AM (#37145855)
Statistically speaking, you were making that all up. Of course in your case it turned out to be serious, but think about how negligible the odds of that are when you're seeing dozens of patients a day during your career.
Re:WASF3 disrupts mitochondria and may mediate exercise into... by sp332 on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @10:18AM (#37147421)
Why would any of those patients make up being in pain, let alone... most of them?
Re:WASF3 disrupts mitochondria and may mediate exercise into... by codeTired on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @10:27AM (#37147561)
So they can spend money on treatment and waste their time obviously. /s
Re:WASF3 disrupts mitochondria and may mediate exercise into... by nradov on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @11:19AM (#37148445)
Opioid addicts frequently make up being in pain in order to obtain prescriptions. That's far less common in physical therapy patients but it does occasionally happen.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9833-munchaus...

Re:WASF3 disrupts mitochondria and may mediate exercise into... by robbintt on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @12:17PM (#37149350)
It's not negligible, BECAUSE you are seeing dozens of patients a day. When you're a doctor, factoring the odds into your diagnosis will screw up your diagnosis BECAUSE you are exposed to the whole probability spectrum, not a quanta of it.

Using "chance of occurrence" is a major logical fallacy for diagnosis identification and can ruin the whole practice.

Re:WASF3 disrupts mitochondria and may mediate exercise into... by abecedarius on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:28PM (#37152366)
Besides the other responses so far, consider this: the consequences of mistakes about this are asymmetrical. A doctor could be exactly correct about the probability of "making it up", but the cost to the patient of a missed diagnosis is not balanced by the benefit of correctly dismissing other cases. A conscientious doctor could try to consciously account for this, but there's no feedback making them get it right (and pressures against, in our current reality).

Also, when a patient succeeds in getting a correct diagnosis after trying multiple doctors, the previous doctors generally will not find out about their mistake, so there's a bias against them actually learning the right probabilities: you can expect them to be overconfident on this score.