GPU-Accelerated LLM on a $100 Orange Pi

Re:GPU-Accelerated LLM on a $100 Orange Pi by jacquesm on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @08:06AM (#37132935)

That's a tricky question. You're going to have to multiplex the use of the device, but since these are mostly 'ping-pong' style uses you can use something called a 'utilization factor' to figure out what a reasonable upper bound is where you still get an answer to your query in acceptable time. The typical mechanism is an input queue with a single worker to use the device. The cut-off is when the queue becomes unacceptably long, in which case you would have to throw an error or be content with waiting (possibly much) longer for your answer. This is usually capped by some hard limit on the length of the queue (for instance: available memory) or the fact that the queue fills up faster than that it can empty even over a complete daily cycle. Once that happens you need more hardware.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPU-Accelerated LLM on a $100 Orange Pi by dekhn on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @05:14PM (#37139351)

Actually many inference systems instead batch all requests within a time period and submit them as a single shot. It increases the average latency but handles more requests per unit time. (at least, this is my understanding how production serving of expensive models that support batching work)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPU-Accelerated LLM on a $100 Orange Pi by jacquesm on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @08:28PM (#37141204)

I've done a bunch of optimization for GPU code (in CUDA) and there are typically a few bottle necks that really matter:

- memory bandwidth

- interconnect bandwidth between the CPU and GPU

- interconnect bandwidth between GPUs

- thermals and power if you're doing a good job of optimizing the rest

I don't see how a batching mechanism would improve on any of those, superficially it looks as though that would make matters worse rather than better. Can you explain where the advantage comes from?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPU-Accelerated LLM on a $100 Orange Pi by dekhn on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @09:39PM (#37141761)

It's a latency vs. throughput tradeoff. I was surprised as well. But most GPUs can do 32 inferences in the same time as they can do 1 inference. They have all the parallel units required and there are significant setup costs that can be amortized since all the inferences share the same model, weights, etc.

https://groq.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GROQP002_V2.2.pd... the "batching" section of https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/tensorrt/archives/tenso... https://le.qun.ch/en/blog/2023/05/13/transformer-batching/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPU-Accelerated LLM on a $100 Orange Pi by jacquesm on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @11:19PM (#37142503)

Very interesting, thank you. I will point one of my colleagues that is busy with this stuff to these and I thank you on his behalf as well, it is exactly the kind of thing they are engaged in.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPU-Accelerated LLM on a $100 Orange Pi by ColonelPhantom on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @09:02AM (#37146427)

I think in the case of LLM inference the main bottleneck is streaming the weights from VRAM to CU/SM/EU (whatever naming your GPU vendor of choice uses).

If you're doing inference on multiple prompts at the same time by doing batching, you don't take more time in streaming. But each streamed weights gets used for, say, 32 calculations instead of 1, making better use of the GPU's compute resources.

[ Parent | on HN ]