News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We Need Scientific Dissidents Now More Than Ever by lelanthran on Saturday August 12, 2023 @01:04PM (#37102143)
You're confusing me with some one else.
Re:We Need Scientific Dissidents Now More Than Ever by zen928 on Saturday August 12, 2023 @04:55PM (#37104156)
it's palpable to the rest of us to see how quick the discussion jumps to feigned confusion, a lack of charity to understand what others are saying and to immediate dishonesty when trying to shut down conversation

they're 'confusing' you for the parent poster of the comment chain you directly replied to in the discussion that you inserted yourself into, something understandable from anyone who spends time on sites that have parent/child discussion chains.

the confusion is solely yours alone, but for any other new users to the site you're taking up the role of continuing the discussion by commenting on reply chains inside that discussion, so having a reply to your comment that mistakenly mentions "your" previous post can be immediately understood in this context as the parents post and not as a misdirected attack that needs to be personally identified before continuing casual discussion.

do you need any more context to respond with honest intentions?

Re:We Need Scientific Dissidents Now More Than Ever by lelanthran on Sunday August 13, 2023 @01:47AM (#37107058)
You're throwing accusations of dishonesty purely because I pointed out that I'm not the original poster?

FCOL, I didn't even make a point/take a side, I genuinely want to know what the difference is between "shutdown a conversation" and "dismiss opposing argument without consideration".

That post was the first post I made on this story, and I'm supposed to accept that prior to posting that I was shutting down discussion?

> it's palpable to the rest of us to see how quick the discussion jumps to feigned confusion, a lack of charity to understand what others are saying and to immediate dishonesty

With all respect to you, that's rich.