This was probably unintended, but giving his real name in your article also marks a precedent.

Even though it was well known in Ruby circles, it had never been published in the press. Now that it has been, his Wikipedia page has been updated accordingly (now that they have a "reliable source" in Wikipedia parlance), which exposes his identity much more than it used to.

For that reason, I wouldn't mind if you redacted his name, the name of his employer and the way you found him out of the article. The same goes for the mirror of the infamous wordpress page.

He made it clear that he wants to be left alone. This doesn't help.

Edit: the mention of his sister was also completely out of place.