Re:Game Theory Explained: Why The Joker and Not Batman is Ou...
by bilbo0s on Thursday March 15, 2012 @11:28AM
(#3708863)
How is scenario 3 different from scenario 1?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Game Theory Explained: Why The Joker and Not Batman is Ou...
by bilbo0s on Thursday March 15, 2012 @11:33AM
(#3708890)
Just re-read your post.
Scenario 3 includes a population of Jokers. That is the difference.
So your assertion... is that Batmen only provide a benefit where there exist Jokers in the population. At least in the Volunteer's Dilemma.
Re:Game Theory Explained: Why The Joker and Not Batman is Ou...
by valuegram on Thursday March 15, 2012 @11:37AM
(#3708905)
Each of the scenarios 1 through 3 builds upon each other. The outcomes of 1 and 3 are similar, but in scenario 2 jokers are introduced into the mix, and in scenario 3 batmans are introduced to counteract the jokers.
...I believe the author is saying that if you have jokers, you need batmans to neutralize their effect.