News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An early look at HNSW performance with pgvector by pashkinelfe on Friday August 11, 2023 @09:17AM (#37088351)
Pgvector doesn't need to store everything in memory. It behaves similar to almost any Postgres AM's and store index data on disk. Performance-wise it's better to have enough memory for index data remain in shared memory buffers, but it is not a requirement for pgvector.
Re:An early look at HNSW performance with pgvector by moab on Friday August 11, 2023 @10:41AM (#37089218)
Thanks for the response. I wonder whether HNSW will still perform well if it needs to page neighbor-lists to/from disk. Do you plan to benchmark the setting where the dataset is too large to fit in-memory?