News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git by cdogl on Friday August 11, 2023 @07:22AM (#37087409)
I prefer clean code that doesn’t have comments except as doc strings for various parsers on declarations and in areas that are particularly surprising.

If I want to know why something was done, I expect to be able to use git log or git blame on the file or line and get find a commit message, issue tracker link or pull request reference that I can pursue.

Re:git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git by thfuran on Friday August 11, 2023 @07:55AM (#37087651)
But then a single minor refactor means you have to dig through history after puzzling over something for long enough to decide that it's definitely no obvious instead of just seeing an inline explanation (or at least a link to one).
Re:git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git by indymike on Friday August 11, 2023 @08:25AM (#37087898)
Issue trackers, vcs and employees change. A meaningful comment stay as long as it is meaningful.
Re:git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git by Corsome on Friday August 11, 2023 @09:34AM (#37088527)
> A meaningful comment stay as long as it is meaningful.

Sometimes even longer :)

Re:git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git by indymike on Saturday August 12, 2023 @12:38PM (#37101901)
# TODO remove this

is my all time favorite.