Re:Dramatic rise in cancer in people under 50
by nonethewiser on Friday August 11, 2023 @07:11AM
(#37087335)
Is power the only relevant variable? What about wavelength?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dramatic rise in cancer in people under 50
by jdietrich on Friday August 11, 2023 @07:25AM
(#37087424)
A photon emitted from a mobile phone antenna has about five orders of magnitude less energy than a photon of visible light. It just isn't plausible that such a relatively small number of relatively low-energy photons could have a meaningful impact on human heath, considering our overall exposure to electromagnetic radiation.
Re:Dramatic rise in cancer in people under 50
by pletnes on Friday August 11, 2023 @07:29AM
(#37087454)
Sure. 3 Watts of gamma rays will do a different job. But a cell phone works in the microwave range - visible light, infrared, UV are all more dangerous - and the sun will blast you with 1 kW on a nice sunny day.
Cell phones are not the problem (well, not the microwaves at least).
Re:Dramatic rise in cancer in people under 50
by refurb on Friday August 11, 2023 @08:08AM
(#37087752)
E = hf
You can measure the energy of one photo using this equation.
Microwaves at 2.45 Ghz = 1.6243499999999998e-24 eV
Gamma radiation at 3 x 10(19) Hz = 1.9889999999999998e-14 eV
So about 10(10) more energy per gamma ray photo or about 10 billion times more energy.
Re:Dramatic rise in cancer in people under 50
by aintgonnatakeit on Friday August 11, 2023 @07:26AM
(#37087431)
Super important https://web.archive.org/web/20100708230258/http://people.csa...