Re:Lichess will no longer cooperate with the USCF and the Sa...
by mbg721 on Thursday August 10, 2023 @03:25PM
(#37080592)
The problem with that is that if the accused is only 30% likely to have done something, then there may be an equal or greater likelihood that the accuser is maliciously lying (allowing for some likelihood of genuine misunderstanding).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lichess will no longer cooperate with the USCF and the Sa...
by atakan_gurkan on Thursday August 17, 2023 @07:05AM
(#37159836)
Not necessarily. Unless the presence of the accusation already was used to get that 30% number, you also need to take into account the a priori probability of someone maliciously lying (or better yet, the particular accuser to be lying in this case) and apply Bayes's theorem.