Re:After 118 days, GPT Unicorn has produced a unicorn
by rcme on Thursday August 10, 2023 @07:04AM
(#37074515)
I'm not sure what you mean by random sampling. If I sample a random SVG, I wouldn't expect to look like anything, let alone roughly like a unicorn.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:After 118 days, GPT Unicorn has produced a unicorn
by sigmoid10 on Thursday August 10, 2023 @07:24AM
(#37074693)
I mean random sampling in the sense how autoregressive language models like GPT generate sequences using token probabilities. It's not a random svg, but the text sequence that is used to draw it suffers from inherent non-determinism in the underlying model.
Re:After 118 days, GPT Unicorn has produced a unicorn
by rcme on Thursday August 10, 2023 @10:54AM
(#37076925)
Relying on token probabilities seems like the exact opposite of random
Re:After 118 days, GPT Unicorn has produced a unicorn
by esafak on Thursday August 10, 2023 @01:13PM
(#37078853)
"Random" is a loose term. We're discussing a technical subject. Talk about the distribution the random numbers are sampled from.
Re:After 118 days, GPT Unicorn has produced a unicorn
by sigmoid10 on Saturday August 12, 2023 @01:22PM
(#37102318)
The neural network just generates a set of probabilities for all tokens. The actual next token is then sampled from this set, which is always random for T>0 (and in the case of GPT4 even for T=0, because of the way the model itself works).