Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by jfghi on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @09:32PM
(#37070784)
But then Uber would be forced to lose even more money while “disrupting” their industry?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by warent on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @10:05PM
(#37071049)
Well yeah... they're forced to lose money in the same way any failed non-viable business is "forced to lose money" lol
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by ambrood on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @10:20PM
(#37071142)
perhaps update your priors at this point. Uber is a profitable company now.
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by jfghi on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @10:28PM
(#37071206)
Wikipedia puts net income at -9.1 billion for 2022. It takes more than one quarters worth of information to update a prior on a 14 year old company.
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by imgabe on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @10:30PM
(#37071217)
Uber had a profitable quarter. They are still $30 billion in the red over the lifetime of the company.
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by sokoloff on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @10:36PM
(#37071243)
Indeed. A net income of $394M doesn't even pay the imputed interest charge on $30B of aggregate losses.