Re:Plunder and Urbit
by ComodoHacker on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @02:03AM
(#37059210)
Providing context is helpful, but putting lens on reader isn't IMO. Should ReiserFS always be viewed through the lens of it's creator's crime?
1. It probably always will be
2. AFAICT some of Yarvin’s ideology, particularly Neo-feudalism, is explicitly baked into Urbit’s design.
Re:Plunder and Urbit
by OfSanguineFire on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @03:50AM
(#37059778)
> Should ReiserFS always be viewed through the lens of it's creator's crime?
The Linux community has broadly decided that the answer to that question is yes. No corporate Linuxes would touch it any more, and it is even scheduled for removal from the kernel.
Re:Plunder and Urbit
by evantbyrne on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @10:25AM
(#37063158)
Without the context of his writings, Urbit does not make any sense at all. It's wholly impractical technology to anyone outside of his segregationist cult.
> It should be obvious that, although I am not a white nationalist, I am not exactly allergic to the stuff.
His projects should probably be viewed through the lens of what he is trying to accomplish more generally.