News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Are Implicit Operators a Path to Clean Code or a Buggy Ni... by mianos on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @11:58PM (#37058542)
If you have ever worked in C++, you will find there are numerous Code Lawyers whose main business is to review all C++ for minor C++2030 infractions, missing optimisations and lack of use of the most obtuse language feature when you do things like:

  int ii = 0;
Re:Are Implicit Operators a Path to Clean Code or a Buggy Ni... by MathMonkeyMan on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @04:23AM (#37059989)
I think you meant

    int ii{};
Re:Are Implicit Operators a Path to Clean Code or a Buggy Ni... by xy2_ on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @05:08AM (#37060283)
I think you meant

    auto ii{};
Re:Are Implicit Operators a Path to Clean Code or a Buggy Ni... by MathMonkeyMan on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @06:14AM (#37060644)
Not at all. I meant

    std::common_type_t<bool, char> ii{};
Re:Are Implicit Operators a Path to Clean Code or a Buggy Ni... by mianos on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @08:23AM (#37061576)
Not sure this one is actually valid. You can't infer a type. Maybe in C++40 where types are so 30s?
Re:Are Implicit Operators a Path to Clean Code or a Buggy Ni... by MathMonkeyMan on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @10:17AM (#37063011)
C++030 is just next year!