Re:“Winners Take None:” Coworking, Self Storage, Scooters Ha...
by opine-at-random on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @06:08PM
(#37056104)
Maybe doesn't make sense for the company. But there's many people involved for whom it must have been an extremely good decision to juice the VC funding quickly and at any expense. Better to have a few millions from a failed startup than nothing XD
Re:“Winners Take None:” Coworking, Self Storage, Scooters Ha...
by dragontamer on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @09:01PM
(#37057509)
Jet.com
This startup sold goods 10% off from Amazon. They did this by buying from Amazon, repackaging the goods in a Jet.com box, and then shipping the new box to the customer.
After losing money on every sale for months, Walmart bought them out and the owners made tons of money.
I'm pretty sure Walmart did nothing with Jet.com and it ended up as a giant waste of money.
Re:“Winners Take None:” Coworking, Self Storage, Scooters Ha...
by 1vuio0pswjnm7 on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @08:29PM
(#37057300)
"The "Uber for X" and "Airbnb for X" largely lacked positive attributes that transportation and travel possessed and accordingly found infrequent usage, low margins, complex processes and so forth. Winner take none."
These are all bank loan types of companies. Why on earth they would go the vc route makes no sense.
This startup sold goods 10% off from Amazon. They did this by buying from Amazon, repackaging the goods in a Jet.com box, and then shipping the new box to the customer.
After losing money on every sale for months, Walmart bought them out and the owners made tons of money.
I'm pretty sure Walmart did nothing with Jet.com and it ended up as a giant waste of money.
Seems like these are cases of basically exploitation.
They're not adding actual value to the economy, but taking lots out.
These idiotic analogies were all over HN.