Amazon Doesn't 'Employ' Drivers, but Hired Firms to Prevent Them from Unionizing

Re:Amazon Doesn't 'Employ' Drivers, but Hired Firms to Preve... by epivosism on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @10:42AM (#37049715)

Yeah I was saying that the original claim was self-contradictory since if you use "resistance exists" as a proof that something is good, then you've already admitted that anti-unionism is good too, since it's also strongly resisted.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Amazon Doesn't 'Employ' Drivers, but Hired Firms to Preve... by wpietri on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @10:59AM (#37049966)

Rewriting a comment after somebody has already responded is very rude. Now your comment is differently wrong, but I'm sure not going to bother with it or you given that you may just keep rewriting the thing I'm responding to.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Amazon Doesn't 'Employ' Drivers, but Hired Firms to Preve... by epivosism on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @11:43AM (#37050749)

Apologies, I was adding detail and don't realize you were already responding. I don't think we disagree though - do you? I still agree with what you responded to, I just removed that phrase because it seemed inflammatory

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Amazon Doesn't 'Employ' Drivers, but Hired Firms to Preve... by venv on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @10:57AM (#37049930)

GP said it was proof of power. Power can be used for good or ill.

[ Parent | on HN ]