I don't get what you mean?

Are you saying that everyone feels strong one way or another?

I’m saying that it is possible to learn how to optimise for “better” or “worse” decisions without being trained on an opinionated dataset of every single event that has happened. An “intelligence” could exist without necessarily answering your nukes question.

You’re bringing alignment to a capability discussion.

How do you suppose we do this? It makes decisions based on numbers alone ?

Personally, I don't think there is a right decision, it was just a decision which had an outcome, for some people it was ab absolutely fucking devastating decision.

This is where I think we have blind spots when developing these systems, I don't think there is a "right" or best answer here. Just some answer.