News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:HTTP Conversation Codes by ashleyw on Thursday November 20, 2008 @02:58AM (#370458) 

    Person A: 200, 417, 502.
    Person B: 204, 503
    Person A: 400?!
    Person B: 402...
    Person A: 405, 200
    Person B: 206, 205, 200?
    Person A: 100.
Your really quite limited on what situations you can play out with HTTP codes... :P
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:HTTP Conversation Codes by IsaacSchlueter on Thursday November 20, 2008 @01:00PM (#370805)
Well, you see, the status code is just a part of the whole HTTP Conversation spec.

You also have the request, response, message headers, message body, request methods, etc.

The W3C CSWG (Conversation Specification Working Group) is currently in the process of selecting members for a committee to write the first draft of the RFC.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:HTTP Conversation Codes by seldo on Thursday November 20, 2008 @04:31AM (#370493)
There's been a ton of interest in this chart, so I turned it into a poster :-) Thanks for visiting, folks!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:HTTP Conversation Codes by abhay on Thursday November 20, 2008 @08:28PM (#371361)
sounds a lot like rest for toddlers by mark pilgrim: http://diveintomark.org/archives/2006/12/07/rest-for-toddler...
[ Parent | on HN ]