Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims
by kaba0 on Monday August 07, 2023 @07:17AM
(#37032951)
If we doubt the legitimacy of basic claims like a fair setup of magnets, then there are much easier ways to create a fake, like just tie something on top of it.. but why would we doubt the legitimacy of reliable institutions?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ongoing compilation table of LK-99 reproduction claims
by DoingIsLearning on Monday August 07, 2023 @07:39AM
(#37033103)
Grand parent was saying it's "impossible". I say it is _technically_ possible.
To which I then added:
"I am not saying this is a hoax, but as exciting as this seems we just have to wait it out for more replication publications to make that call"
It last been a little over 2 weeks since the first pre-print from Korea University.
The hashing out of a fabrication process with less impurities will be a long one. My point is not that everyone is pulling a con, my point is that we need to wait it out.