Anyways beyond that, dentistry sits in a very interesting position where there isn't a whole lot that can be done (without major breakthrough). It's why so much is based on preventative measure. It's also why the field feels "antiquated" in a way, we're still using simple instruments to scrape the teeth (or inside the tooth when it comes to root canals), or yanking the entire tooth out. We haven't got much farther than cavemen using stones to clean plaque in that way, besides the pain mitigation.
It's the one field that is ripe for revolutionary improvements if it weren't for corporations constantly pushing their garbage studies.
It might work, but the conflict of interest is there and you’ll never know if there wasn’t a superior/cheaper/more suitable alternative.
Ditto Oral B toothbrushes. Or Pedigree Pal at vets.
From my point of view (patient), I feels like dentists base their treatment recommendations on how much kickback they’re getting from medical corporations (Invisalign anyone?) and biased papers.
I wonder why dentistry is so far removed from the rest of the medical profession on this. Not that MDs are immune to the above but it feels to me like it’s not as bad as in dentistry.