Re:AI Won’t Replace Humans – But Humans with AI Will Replace...
by ivy137 on Saturday August 05, 2023 @07:50AM
(#37011100)
a parlor trick lol. Here we are seeing statistics applied on abstract terms as human knowledge, how this is something with few practical applications?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI Won’t Replace Humans – But Humans with AI Will Replace...
by FridgeSeal on Saturday August 05, 2023 @08:09AM
(#37011224)
Because the results and actual efficiency gains are flaky, inconsistent and mostly limited to boilerplate?
GPT and friends are very impressive, yes; if you’re also impressed by your intern blindly copying stack overflow.
Re:AI Won’t Replace Humans – But Humans with AI Will Replace...
by ivy137 on Saturday August 05, 2023 @09:38AM
(#37011894)
Maybe I am a fun of fuzzy logic, but I find gpt less flaky than most people that I read about, I think it will evolve. I feel gpt will even allow us to create new branch of mathematics applied at psychology.
I can't understand why you compare it with an intern copy paste, it's simply absurd to compare. Looks just a way of reducing the argument and drawing parallelism where there are none. Yes, some people use it to program, No, not everyone uses it for programming