Re:Judge Orders Failed Copyright Troll to Forfeit 'All' Copy...
by aaronblohowiak on Tuesday March 13, 2012 @09:00PM
(#3701233)
>you would pay tax commensurate with the amount of revenue you derive for it
that's what income tax is.
Re:Judge Orders Failed Copyright Troll to Forfeit 'All' Copy...
by Jebus on Tuesday March 13, 2012 @09:19PM
(#3701301)
Just a correction: "ideas" per se cannot be protected. Only inventions (patents) and IP (copyright)
Re:Judge Orders Failed Copyright Troll to Forfeit 'All' Copy...
by rcfox on Tuesday March 13, 2012 @09:56PM
(#3701428)
Works (poetry, prose, songs, art, source code, etc.) are protected by copyright.
Inventions and processes can be protected by patents.
Names and branding can be protected by trademarks.
Secrets can be protected as trade secrets, often in the form of non-disclosure agreements.
I've held the view for a long time that copyrights, patents, and other "intellectual property" should be treated like physical property, specifically real estate.
Imagine, in trade for having exclusive rights to something, you would pay tax commensurate with the amount of revenue you derive for it. You could even keep an idea protected in perpetuity, assuming the tax is progressively structured so that the general public benefits from you doing so.