And why shouldn't it be? Heavily subsidizing education is paramount for a state, and an investment into its own future.

BTW, what did Bourdieux propose?

The issue is not that it’s heavily subsidised. It’s that it has piss poor results for what it costs the French public compared to what’s done by others.

Bourdieu didn’t need to propose anything. He proved data in hand that the system was unfair. A quick look at the current situation of France should tell you all you need to know about how effective the system actually is.

But finding ideas is not that hard. We could just get our heads out of our asses and copy what’s done in a country having better results. Spoiler alert, the answer is not a system generalising the structure of military schools to whole areas of higher educations put in place by a military dictatorship to curb the emergence of dissenting elites in the university system. It still baffle me that this has to be pointed to the average French. This country really deserves what it has become.

> Bourdieu didn’t need to propose anything. He proved data in hand that the system was unfair.

La crtitique est aisée, l'art est difficile.

> We could just get our heads out of our asses and copy what’s done in a country having better results.

Id est? The US system, where you can get a pass into an Ivy league if your granddaddy paid enough money, the Chinese system where any exam can be skipped with a few millions yuans, or the Russian system where the children are taken from their families at 12y.o.?