News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Non-Mathematical Introduction to Kalman Filters for Pro... by a_wild_dandan on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @12:02PM (#36972722)
To clarify, you mean completely independent speed measurements, right? As in speeds not derived from the position measurements? Otherwise, that feels like getting something from nothing.
Re:A Non-Mathematical Introduction to Kalman Filters for Pro... by bee_rider on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @12:40PM (#36973284)
I believe part of the cleverness of the Kalman Filter is that it works out the degree to which your measurements are correlated for you. I haven’t looked at it in a while, though.
Re:A Non-Mathematical Introduction to Kalman Filters for Pro... by tnecniv on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @01:49PM (#36974313)
Not your measurements. That correlation must be specified. It works out the correlations of your state (the thing you are estimating).

In the above example, their measurements are noisy mechanical states (position and momentum). However your measurements can be any (linear plus noise) function of the state, but you need the covariance of your sensor noise.

Re:A Non-Mathematical Introduction to Kalman Filters for Pro... by asimeqi on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @12:26PM (#36973108)
I meant speeds derived from previous position measurements. Using those speeds is not getting something from nothing. It means using previous measurements to estimate where the object might be now then combine that estimate with current measurement to have the "best" estimate for its current position, for some definition of best.