Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99
by objektif on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @10:43PM
(#36966358)
CMTC comes of as a whiny little POS tbh. They have the exact opposite of the attitude I would have expected from a scientist.
In their first thread regarding this topic they were almost flat out belittling the og authors. WTF.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99
by selimthegrim on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @11:38PM
(#36966695)
Because CMTC has high theory standards and the authors, to put it charitably, didn’t
This is the one from the all infamous University of Maryland correct? lol.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99
by selimthegrim on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @08:06AM
(#36969711)
They may have been throwing a bit of shade around lately but they are by and large reputable scientists barring whatever SDS’s past MA announcement involvement was. It’s more than just him there.
I do not (almost everyone else too) associate "reputable scientist" with University of Maryland. So they should show a bit of humility.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99
by selimthegrim on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @11:11AM
(#36971972)
Show me where on the doll they touched you.
Hey no need to get sensitive about it. I am seriously saying University of Maryland (chuckle) is just not enough for bragging rights. Do not worry may he when you grow up you will end up in an ivy.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99
by selimthegrim on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @06:16PM
(#36978498)
I don’t have anything to do with them and I went to Caltech.
Re:Electronic Structure of LK-99
by selimthegrim on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @07:07PM
(#36979099)
*MS not MA