Re:A Room-Temperature Superconductor? New Developments
by soligern on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @09:35PM
(#36965855)
We’re not talking about charging existing batteries but superconductors where you just “trap” large amounts of electricity in the superconductor for future use.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Room-Temperature Superconductor? New Developments
by ben_w on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @06:58AM
(#36969245)
Unfortunately magnets put forces on themselves, which means you’re limited to storing up to about as much energy as it would take to break the thing making the field; or, to put it another way, it’s about the same range of energy densities as springs or rubber bands.
Earlier discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36954783
Re:A Room-Temperature Superconductor? New Developments
by eternityforest on Wednesday August 02, 2023 @11:01PM
(#36980859)
Does that mean you would get equal(but probably insanely more dangerous) performance with a giant miles long spring instead of the proposed superconducting loops?