Re:Defining Property
by davidw on Monday March 12, 2012 @07:07PM
(#3696145)
"That which is not seen" is a great deal of other software that otherwise might be out there were there not laws against that sort of thing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Defining Property
by icebraining on Monday March 12, 2012 @07:33PM
(#3696218)
I'd like to see some evidence of that, please.
Well, the links you pointed to are for fairly old versions of Windows, and they are on a pirate site, rather than any old site that chooses to host them in the US. Is Mac OS there in its entirety? How about Oracle? DB2 from IBM?
Re:Defining Property
by icebraining on Tuesday March 13, 2012 @07:22AM
(#3697901)
So the fact that the source isn't there is proof that copyright prevented it? I may have a tiger repellent rock to sell you.
You need to provide evidence that the source of the Mac OS, Oracle or DB2 would be there if copyright didn't exist.
Look at the availability of Linux source code compared to Mac OS X. It's everywhere.
In terms of proof and evidence, no one can really "prove" anything without actually experiencing the counterfactual world. You can't prove that MacOS X code would not be everywhere, for instance, just as I can't prove that it would be.
The best we can do is look for evidence that suggests how things might go.