News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s w... by LatteLazy on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @11:30AM (#36957303)
It's not the same thing but...

We've had 2 of 3 engineering role candidates we recently made offers to decline citing our 3 days a week in office policy...

Re:Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s w... by pc86 on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @11:36AM (#36957410)
Are you not advertising that it's 60% in-office? It seems surprising that multiple people would see that and go the whole way to an offer without self-selecting out.
Re:Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s w... by LatteLazy on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @12:03PM (#36957868)
We are.

I think in both cases people were selecting between us and another job. One said he was taking another job for 10k LESS (GBP) but full remote.

(As always, the stated reasons might not be accurate)

Re:Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s w... by yomlica8 on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @12:21PM (#36958143)
The cost of maintaining transportation and the unpaid hours from a commute are quite significant. Depending upon their circumstances they could be taking home more money even being paid less.
Re:Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s w... by LatteLazy on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @12:40PM (#36958469)
100% this.

Here in the UK, just not having to live near London will save you enormous amounts on rent/mortgage as well.

I'm in the office full time (I actually need to be) and I pay 700 a month just in rent on a crappy room not too close to central. That alone is the equivalent of about £17k before tax, and I am a single guy who doesn't mind housemates. No thanks.

Re:Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s w... by Octoth0rpe on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @12:05PM (#36957890)
It seems likely that candidates are comparing offers, which requires them to get a decent amount of the way through the hiring process.