News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by outsidetheparty on Monday July 31, 2023 @05:01PM (#36948770)
When I've tried using it I've generally found that it leads me in circles between incompatible versions of a framework or tool -- it'll give me syntax that's correct for one version, but wants to use it to call a function that only exists in a different version, that sort of thing. They're not even hallucinations, each step is technically correct, but can't be used successfully with the other steps.
Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow by arp242 on Monday July 31, 2023 @05:46PM (#36949301)
Another thing I found is that it can have "obvious omissions". As in: the answer is correct, and it works, but it's a bad solution and there's a much more obvious and better way to solve it.

"Technically correct", but also not good.