Re:NASA mistakenly severs communication to Voyager 2
by mcguire on Monday July 31, 2023 @02:54PM
(#36947187)
Ok, what is this quote from?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NASA mistakenly severs communication to Voyager 2
by wholinator2 on Monday July 31, 2023 @04:08PM
(#36948075)
Wait, i don't understand. I was under the assumption that this text was a joke, but now I'm seeing it in reference to air force training materials? Is it a joke there as well or did someone actually write this text seriously, and plan for it's use as intelligible instruction?
Re:NASA mistakenly severs communication to Voyager 2
by wizofaus on Monday July 31, 2023 @04:19PM
(#36948203)
There's oodles of references to this online but nothing really I've found so far explaining whether it was ever intended to be taken seriously in the first place. It's hard to imagine anyone doing so.
Re:NASA mistakenly severs communication to Voyager 2
by KptMarchewa on Monday July 31, 2023 @05:27PM
(#36949106)
It's apparently from the 50s, as seen here: https://archive.org/details/sim_electronics-now_1959-03_30_3...
Re:NASA mistakenly severs communication to Voyager 2
by kens on Monday July 31, 2023 @08:24PM
(#36950754)
Yes, it's a joke. It's not complete nonsense, though, unlike the Turboencabulator. There's a real explanation buried inside there. ("Where it isn't" is the target position, so it's looking at the deviation between where it currently is, and where it should be. The next time step, "where it wasn't" is the old target position, and so forth.)