Re:Researchers reached the bottom of ice sheet at -2670M aft...
by 6D794163636F756 on Monday July 31, 2023 @12:57PM
(#36945511)
Thank you for pointing this out. I thought it was referring to the age of the samples taken before reading your comment. It made the abstract less disappointing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Researchers reached the bottom of ice sheet at -2670M aft...
by marcosdumay on Monday July 31, 2023 @12:59PM
(#36945546)
I only clicked on the article because I thought it was the age of the samples too.
Re:Researchers reached the bottom of ice sheet at -2670M aft...
by adolph on Monday July 31, 2023 @01:45PM
(#36946222)
If something has a negative age, does that mean it is from the future?
Re:Researchers reached the bottom of ice sheet at -2670M aft...
by stefncb on Monday July 31, 2023 @02:46PM
(#36947090)
I can't tell if you're joking, but negative numbers are used to represent years BC.
Re:Researchers reached the bottom of ice sheet at -2670M aft...
by adolph on Monday July 31, 2023 @03:44PM
(#36947768)
It responds to the comment "I only clicked on the article because I thought it was the age of the samples too." Age is "The length of time that a person or thing has existed." AD and BC are both absolute values from a zero point, both positive ("1 BC is year 0, 45 BC is year −44" [0]). A relative chronological dating by some phenomenological method such as radiocarbon or thermolumenescence might establish a negative date relative to some other known benchmark [1].
How might something dated from the future be found? I'm not certain, but maybe it has to do with aliens that are all the rage nowadays.
If I were 12 years old, I would have been born 12 years ago.
2023
- 12
----
2011
If I were -12 years old, I would be born 12 years from now. 2023
- -12
----
2035
0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Domini